Archive for the ‘Mortgage Bankers Association’ Category
Liars Game Ends, Mortgage Bankers Bleat
Talk about misleading leades….
Average mortgage closing costs have jumped 40 percent in Illinois this year, according to an online survey by personal finance company Bankrate Inc.
Nonsense.
Let’s look at it:
Lenders are now required to provide an estimate of title and closing fees within 10 percent of what the final cost will be, or they’ll risk penalties. The regulations require more labor in getting a loan together.
Ah. Lenders are now required to actually tell you how much the closing costs will be, instead of lying about it up front and then hosing you at the closing table, or worse, hiding the costs via some sort of rate-jack or other tricky gimmick?
How does this increase costs?
What’s really happened with the “new regulations” is that:
-
It is no longer legal to screw people with “surprises” that are wildly beyond the so-called “good-faith” estimates given when you apply.
-
It is also no longer legal to roll closing costs in a hidden fashion via interest-rate and other tricks, including prepayment penalties. If it’s a cost it has to be shown as a cost – so people can evaluate what you’re doing, and what’s in their best interest.
That is, now the actual funding costs are visible to you. This is then bleated about as an “increase”, when it really is just exposing costs you paid before, but which were cleverly hidden from your view in many cases, and in fact were grossly-inflated in most.
When a processing cost is hidden from you via these tricks it can be marked up by ridiculous amounts. A $1,000 fee that is hidden via a 25 basis point increase in the cost of your loan looks cheaper to you, but in point of fact on a $200,000 mortgage is it?
Let’s assume the “no hidden costs” loan is at 4.5%, $200,000, for 30 years. Your P&I is $1,009.58.
Now let’s presume you “roll” that $1,000 closing cost “increase” in the referenced article into the loan “silently”, and pay 4.75% instead. Your P&I is now $1039.18.
That’s about $30 a month. Looks like a good deal, right?
But is it really?
The average home is occupied for about 7 years (actual duration, not contracted duration) – this is why the mortgage industry tends to hedge using the 10 year treasury, and not the 30. But you pay $360 a year for the privilege of hiding that $1,000. In less than three years you’ve paid it. In seven years you pay it more than twice.
Now just who got hosed here, assuming you intend to stay in the house for more than three years? Gee, I wonder….. NOT!
Part of the problem with the housing bubble was driven by these tricks. Americans were rooked into taking loans they could not afford via these tricks, which were poorly-understood (if understood at all) yet which were extremely profitable (for the mortgage issuers and bankers, of course.) Now that these games have to stop suddenly we have bankers claiming there has been a “huge increase” in funding costs.
Sorry folks, but exposing a hidden fee does not a cost increase make. It simply brings into the sunlight the financial rape you were being subjected to without your knowledge in the past.
Dubai: Floating on an Island of Debt
By Economic Forecasts & Opinions
Stock markets around the world cracked on Friday with the Dow Jones industrial average down more than 150 points (Fig. 1), and commodities plunging as Dubai debt woes unnerved investors, and sent tremors of uncertainty throughout all markets.
Concerns that a government-backed investment company risked default ripped through world markets. Investors read it as a sign of yet another sovereign implosion after Iceland and Ireland, and recoiled from risk and piled into dollars.
Deutsche Bank estimates that Dubai’s property prices, both commercial and residential, have halved since August last year, and could fall a further 15-20% this year.
U.S. Banks Less Exposed
Most analysts believe U.S. banks are probably less exposed than European rivals to a potential debt default by Dubai World, but a lack of transparency and the interconnection of the modern financial system make it difficult to know which institutions are ultimately exposed.
Dubai World’s largest creditors are reportedly domestic banks in Dubai and Abu Dhabi. MarketWatch noted data from the Bank for International Settlements which put cross-border banking exposure for the UAE as a whole at $123 billion at the end of June. Of that total, European banks hold 72%, with the United States and Japan only holding 9% and 7% of the exposure, respectively. The United Kingdom is by far the biggest creditor with a share of 41%.
Reminder of Other Risks
As pointed out in my previous article that the commercial real estate sector posed a much greater threat than the over-hyped “mother of all carry trades.” The Dubai debt crisis further reinforces this viewpoint.
As commercial property values fall, debt defaults rise. The $3.4 trillion outstanding in debt backed by commercial real estate poses a real threat to the recovery. Trepp LLC reported that last month, delinquencies on U.S. commercial real estate loans that were packaged into commercial mortgage-backed securities reached 4.8%, more than six times the year earlier level. Hotel loans, at 8.7% distressed, have begun falling into delinquency faster than any other kind of commercial real estate debt.
Write-downs and losses at banks around the world have risen to more than $1.7 trillion since 2007 as the credit crisis undermined the value of assets owned by financial institutions, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Any further deleveraging and the resulting credit tightening from commercial real estate would impede the financial sector and probably derail the U.S. economy sending it into another recession.
Housing Market Mortgage Crisis
Based on a study released by Zillow.com, the foreclosure crisis has moved beyond subprime mortgages and into the prime mortgage market. (Fig. 3) While subprime borrowers are still a factor in the current foreclosure epidemic, it’s becoming increasingly apparent that the weak labor market is the driving force behind the mortgage crisis we face today.
According to the Mortgage Bankers Association, one in seven U.S. home loans was past due or in foreclosure as of Sept. 30, putting that quarterly delinquency measure at its highest level since the report’s inception, 1972, and up from one in ten at the beginning of the year.
The continued surge in delinquencies suggests that a recovery in the housing market could be hindered by the weak job market as well as by further fallout from the easy money and loose lending practices of the past. The foreclosures and delinquencies are expected to keep rising well into 2010, not leveling off until the unemployment rate starts to moderate.
In a study by First American CoreLogic found that one in four of all U.S. mortgage-borrowers owe more than the value of their properties in the 3rd quarter. And many experts didn’t expect U.S. home prices to hit bottom until early 2011, perhaps falling another 5-10%, as more foreclosures get pushed onto the market.
Negative equity is another outstanding risk hanging over the mortgage market.
Dubai Is No Lehman
The circumstances behind Dubai’s moves are murky, making it hard to gauge the exact risk to the pertaining bonds and Dubai’s own general creditworthiness. UBS cautioned that Dubai’s overall debt “might be higher than the generally assumed $80 billion to $90 billion, due to potential off-balance sheet liabilities. These could include unlimited and unquantifiable amount of credit default swaps (CDS) and other derivatives against the underlying assets, and once unraveled, could potentially erupt into a subprime-like crisis.
The current expectation; however, is that there’s a good chance that Dubai’s problems will probably prove a local issue. Most likely, Dubai, or its neighboring emirate, Abu Dhabi, won’t risk tarnishing their images and reputation further, and will come up with a reasonable resolution.
Even if Dubai goes into sovereign default, the amount is probably not enough on its own to threaten the financial system since any actual losses would be a fraction of the total. So, the problems in Dubai are unlikely to be as serious as last year’s Lehman Brothers collapse, nor is it a reflection on the ability of emerging markets to lead a global economic recovery.
Rational Expectations?
But Dubai could well spur a broader crisis of investor confidence in overly leveraged economies as market confidence world-wide is still fragile from the severity of the financial crisis. The debts of many emerging markets have risen even further as the countries governments have fought the ravages of the global recession by issuing more stimulus debt to fill the gap voided by private investment.
The spread of credit-default swaps on developing-nation’s bonds jumped 14 basis points after the Dubai news broke, the most in a month, to 3.24 percentage points, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s EMBI+ Index. There is also a clear sign of potential contagion effects of global risk aversion on basically all risky assets, with the dollar and yen being the prime beneficiaries.
Rational expectations or not, for now, the Dubai crisis is simply a reminder that the severe global recession has relegated much debt to near junk status, and there still remains a high degree of uncertainty as to the percentage recoverable on all outstanding debt which is going to be coming due over the next 5 years.
Despite some seminal signs of green shoots in the news headlines during this 9 month liquidity driven rally in many asset classes around the globe, we should be reminded that all that glitters is not gold, and that the global economic recovery is still on shaky ground.








